Model-specific kernels
Profile each model and hardware pair, then tune the operations, memory movement, and execution path that dominate its workload.
↘Model-specific inference systems
General runtimes flatten every model into the same machine. We go the other direction—inside the graph, beneath the framework, toward the shortest possible path from request to token.
The model is not
the machine.
Between weights and tokens sits an execution path most providers leave generic. That path is where latency accumulates, memory moves twice, and economics disappear.
Kernelwright rewrites it—model by model, bottleneck by bottleneck.
Profile each model and hardware pair, then tune the operations, memory movement, and execution path that dominate its workload.
↘Optimize kernels, quantization, KV cache, graph capture, batching, queueing, and admission control as one serving system.
↘Preserve OpenAI-compatible chat completions, streaming, tool calling, structured outputs, and usage accounting.
↘03 / THE ARENA
Kernelwright’s kernel work is winning in Cacheon and other GPU performance competitions. The discipline is the same one we bring to serving systems: isolate the real bottleneck, beat the incumbent on fixed hardware, preserve fidelity, repeat.
How Cacheon evaluates kernels04 / THE CONTRACT
Kernelwright is built for inference marketplaces and product teams that need a narrow model catalog, predictable interfaces, transparent usage accounting, and capacity that behaves under load.
Operating principlesLicense / workload / hardware fit
Kernels / cache / batching
Streaming / tools / structured output
Sustained throughput / admission control
05 / INTEGRATE